Understanding the Difference Between True Conservatives and Real Conservatives

The political landscape in the United States has been characterized by a significant divide, particularly in the realm of conservative politics. This divide is often seen in the varying interpretations of what it means to be a true conservative versus a real conservative. The distinction seems to revolve around one's attitude towards populism and the perceived integrity and motivations of political figures and movements.

The Collision of Political Ideals

Those who believe that populism inherently promotes anti-intellectualism and the foolish impulses of the masses argue that a "true" conservative must oppose populist movements for the sake of intellectual integrity. Overwatchers of the political scene such as George Will exemplify this perspective when they oppose figures like Donald Trump and the "MAGA" movement on ideological grounds. George Will, a prominent conservative commentator, is a vocal critic of populist elements, seeing in them a threat to the intellectual foundations of conservative thought.

The Defense of the People

On the other side, supporters of the "MAGA" movement contend that they are not necessarily any less "intellectual" than their opponents and, in fact, are more honest and courageous in their efforts to expose what they perceive as lying propaganda, government corruption, and election fraud. They argue that their true point is to oppose the elite and arrogant establishment, which they believe is motivated by corrupt interests that are contrary to America's best interests. This group sees itself as "real" conservatives who forcefully and courageously advocate for America as it was intended to be from its founding. They are unyielding in their refusal to compromise or align with progressive powers, which seek to dismantle the nation.

The Accusation of Collaboration

Some people label these contrasting groups as either "true" conservatives or "real" conservatives. However, the term "true" conservatives is more fitting for those who align with progressive interests and support a big government, bureaucratic state, and globalist interests over American national interests. They hence aid and abet the real fascists. This accusation highlights a stark contrast between those who work to drain the swamp and those who embrace the swamp as their political habitat.

Definitions and Examples

A "true" conservative, according to this perspective, is someone like Liz Cheney, Mitt Romney, John McCain, Mike Pence, or George W. Bush. These figures are characterized by their adherence to traditional conservative principles, respect for the democratic process, and their ability to adapt to changing political landscapes without compromising on core values. A "true" conservative, in this context, is a non-MAGA and non-alt-right Republican who respects election results even when they are unfavorable.

In contrast, figures like Donald Trump, Sean Hannity, and Kari Lake are seen as fitting the definition of a fascist. This label is based on their support for authoritarian behaviors, their willingness to undermine democratic institutions, and their alignment with progressive, globalist, and leftist interests. It is important to note that the term "fascist" is often used critically to describe those who advocate for strongman politics and question the democratic process.

Conclusion

The difference between a "true" conservative and a "real" conservative is a complex issue rooted in varying interpretations of conservative ideals and their application in contemporary American politics. The continued polarization of conservative thought highlights the need for clear definitions and values to guide political behavior and uphold democratic institutions.