The Valid and Invalid Reasons for Believing in a Higher Power

The age-old question of whether a higher power or a god exists has been a subject of intense debate for millennia. This article aims to explore both valid and invalid reasons for believing in such a power, drawing upon philosophical, scientific, and theological perspectives.

Introduction to the Argument

The inherent self-evident belief that humans are created equal and endowed by their Creator with unalienable rights is a foundational concept in many societies. However, the assertion that life comes from the living and non-living things stay that way for ever, coupled with the complexity of a human being, presents a compelling case for the existence of a higher power. The intricate functioning of trillions of cells, vital organs, and exclusive tissues within the human body defies naturalistic explanation. How can it be conceivable that an entity without senses, such as the eye, could naturally evolve to function correctly? The impossibility of this phenomenon further supports the notion of a divine creator.

The Role of Faith and Perception

The evidence for belief in a higher power is subject to interpretation. Christians perceive the world and its elements as manifesting divine craftsmanship through intricate design, while atheists tend to find no evidence despite the same universe. For believers, even a flower becomes a testament to God's creation. Conversely, atheists might view the same flower as just another biological occurrence. This divergence in interpretation suggests that the perception of evidence is deeply rooted in one's faith or lack thereof.

Metaphysical Principals and Absoluteness

Believers often accept metaphysical principles as undeniable truths about reality. This acceptance extends beyond scientific evidence and delves into philosophical and theological realms. The concept of a material god that is lesser than or equal to humans is inconsequential to many believers, as they seek a higher power that transcends human limitations. The assertion that humans are without excuse, as posited in Rom 1:18-20, underscores the intuitive understanding of a higher power among those who are not clouded by deception.

Controversial Aspects of Religious Beliefs

Religious beliefs, especially the concept of a divine being, are often intertwined with cultural and societal constructs. Some argue that the earliest human beings worshipped a goddess with large breasts, suggesting that the deity's attributes can be aligned with human desires and aesthetics. This perspective challenges traditional views of monotheistic deities and posits that humankind's earliest forms of worship were more anthropomorphic.

Scientific Approaches and Evidence

Science also plays a crucial role in the discourse surrounding the existence of a higher power. Abiogenesis, the theory of life arising from non-living matter, remains a mystery without divine intervention. The DNA, with its intricate coding and information, implies an intelligent sentient source. This scientific evidence supports the theological perspective that a higher power is necessary to explain the complexity of life on Earth. Furthermore, the Psalms 53:1 emphasizes that the existence of God is intuitive for those who are not depraved in their thinking.

In conclusion, the belief in a higher power can be reasonable and substantiated through both faith and empirical evidence. However, it is essential to distinguish between valid and invalid reasons for this belief, recognizing the role of faith, scientific inquiry, and the inherent metaphysical principles that underpin many religious convictions.