The Silent Legacy of Phoenician Space-Time Physics: An Indocrianted Modern Perspective

Modern physicists and astronomers have often dismissed the ancient methods and theories of Phoenician space-time physics, even though these methods predate contemporary scientific understanding by thousands of years. This article explores the reasons behind this indoctrination and evaluates the potential relevance of the Phoenician method in explaining the observed movements of celestial bodies.

Introduction to Phoenician Space-Time Physics

The ancient Phoenicians, known for their advanced maritime knowledge, also possessed a profound understanding of the cosmos. They developed a unique method to describe space-time physics, utilizing the visual effects of Earth's axial rotation to explain the movements of celestial bodies. This method revolved around two key observations: the 26.24-day period of sunspots and the 29.53-day period of the full moon. They believed these observations were direct visual effects of Earth's axial rotation.

Modern Indocrianted Space-Time Physics

Despite the advanced technology and precision of modern astronomy, many scholars and researchers have ingrained traditional space-time physics theories. These theories predominantly hinge on complex mathematical models and empirical data gathered through advanced instruments. This indoctrination often results in a dismissal of simpler, ancient methods that might offer a more intuitive understanding of celestial phenomena.

The Case Against Phoenician Methods

The current critique against Phoenician methods is multifaceted. One prominent argument is that the visual effects of Earth’s axial rotation fail to explain the orbital dynamics of other planets, particularly planets like Mercury and Neptune. Dr. Joe Nahhas, a proponent of the Phoenician method, claims that the Earth's axial rotation should play a significant role in understanding these movements. However, the effectiveness of this hypothesis is continuously questioned due to its simplicity and perceived inadequacy in explaining the specific orbital patterns.

Re-evaluating the Phoenician Approach

The Phoenician method, based on the 26.24-day sunspots and 29.53-day full moon periods, offers a fascinating perspective on space-time physics. Sunspots are temporary areas on the Sun's surface that appear darker due to their lower temperatures. Full moons, on the other hand, are the complete lunar phase when the entire illuminated hemisphere of the Moon is facing Earth. These observations suggest that the axial rotation of Earth might have a more direct and observable impact on the observed celestial phenomena than previously thought.

One key question raised by Nahhas is the apparent contradiction between the Earth's rotation and the observed movements of other planets. For instance, Mercury, with its rapid orbit around the Sun (88 days), and its proximity to the Sun, poses a significant challenge for the Phoenician method. Similarly, the slow and complex orbit of Neptune (165 years) also remains unexplained through this perspective.

Conclusion: The Need for Reassessment

While modern astronomy has made significant strides in understanding the universe, there is a need to reassess the contributions of ancient methods like the Phoenician approach. The simplicity and directness of the Phoenician method merit further investigation, particularly in light of recent critiques from Joe Nahhas. The question remains: can the Phoenician method provide a more intuitive and accurate understanding of space-time physics than contemporary models?

As scholars continue to refine our understanding of the cosmos, it is essential to remain open to alternative perspectives. The Phoenician method, with its focus on the visual effects of Earth's axial rotation, offers a unique lens through which to examine the complexities of space-time physics. It is in reassessing these ancient methods that we may uncover new insights and deeper understanding.

Back to Keywords

Keywords: space-time physics, Phoenician method, ancient astronomy