The Nuances of Logically Valid and Sound Arguments: Can a Valid Argument Be Made Sound?

Arguments are fundamental tools in both academic and everyday discourse. However, the distinction between a logically valid argument and a sound argument is often misunderstood. A logically valid argument is one in which the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises, even if the premises are not themselves true. In contrast, a sound argument is one that is not only valid but also has all true premises, making the conclusion true. This article explores these concepts, particularly focusing on whether a logically valid argument can be made sound.

What Makes an Argument Logically Valid but Not Sound

Validity and soundness are two different aspects of an argument. An argument is valid if, and only if, the conclusion logically follows from the premises, regardless of whether the premises are true or not. In other words, a valid argument has the structure such that if the premises were true, the conclusion would also be true.

To illustrate, consider the following example:

tp1: A implies B

tp2: C implies D

tConclusion: A implies Z

While premises p1 and p2 might be true or accepted as true, the conclusion does not necessarily follow from them. The connection between the premises and the conclusion is incomplete or irrelevant. Therefore, the argument is logically valid, but it is not sound because it contains a logical flaw. However, the conclusion might still be correct, just not through the given argument. This is the crux of a valid argument that is not sound.

Can a Logically Valid Argument Be Made Sound?

The answer largely depends on the nature of the gap or logical flaw in the argument. If the argument is valid but unsound due to a logical fallacy or an incomplete premise set, it is possible to amend it to be sound. This is achieved by either:

Adding more premises: Additional premises can be introduced to fill the logical gaps, ensuring that the conclusion can be proven from a set of true premises. Revising the premises to include the missing link: Removing irrelevant premises or adding a direct link that bridges the gap between the premises and the conclusion, thus making the argument more rigorous and sound.

Continuing with the example above:

tp1: A implies B

tp2: C implies D

tp3: B implies C

tp4: D implies Z

By adding p3 (B implies C) or p4 (D implies Z), the argument becomes sound. Either p3 or p4 directly connects B and C, or D and Z, making the conclusion (A implies Z) logically and factually supported by the premises.

The Role of True Premises in Soundness

A sound argument requires not only that the argument is valid but also that all the premises are true. This is because a valid argument with false premises can still have a false conclusion, as shown in the initial example. For a valid argument to be sound, it must meet both criteria:

Validity: The argument is structured such that the conclusion follows logically from the premises. Truth of Premises: All the premises must be factually true to ensure the conclusion is also true.

Therefore, an argument cannot be sound without being valid, as a sound argument cannot have false premises. Conversely, a valid argument that includes false premises is not sound, as the logical structure alone is insufficient to guarantee the truth of the conclusion.

Conclusion

Understanding the distinction between logically valid and sound arguments is crucial for effective reasoning and critical thinking. While a valid argument can have gaps that make it unsound, these can often be addressed by adding or revising premises. However, achieving soundness requires not only logical validity but also the truth of all the premises. This highlights the importance of both logical structure and the accuracy of premises in constructing a strong, sound argument.

Further Reading

To delve deeper into these concepts, explore the following topics:

Logical fallacies Proof by logical structure Demonstrating the truth of premises

[WordPress, Google, SEO]