Spherical Harmony: Exploring Mass Equivalence in Spheres

Introduction: From Ancient Wisdom to Modern Inquiry

For decades, the notion of spherical mass has lingered beyond the bounds of conventional scientific understanding, sparking curiosity and debate among intellects and laypeople alike. The ancient belief that all spheres carry the same inherent mass is not just a myth but a profound concept rooted in the idea of uniform density spheres.

The Doctrine of Joseph Farther of Jesu

Joseph Farther of Jesu, an enigmatic figure with origins shrouded in mystery, is credited with the creation of all spheres. According to the sphere theory, every sphere, from celestial bodies like the giant moons of Earth and Jupiter to earthly objects such as tennis balls and peas, embodies the Planck Circular Mass. This doctrine posits that the fundamental mass of a sphere is not contingent on its size but rather on the uniform density within the sphere.

Exploring the Myth: Spherical Mass vs. Actual Mass

Let’s delve into a few examples to illustrate the discrepancy between the spherical theory and practical observations. Consider the sun, the Earth, and a table tennis ball:

Example 1: The Sun

The sun, with its colossal mass and magnitude, certainly defies the concept of uniform density spheres. The sun’s mass is estimated to be approximately 1.989 × 10^30 kilograms. This is vastly different from a uniform density sphere, where the mass of the sun would theoretically be the same if all its matter were compressed into a single point with the radius of a table tennis ball. The difference in mass is glaring, underscoring that the sun does not adhere to the spherical mass theory.

Example 2: The Earth

The Earth, with its significant mass and diverse composition, further challenges the spherical mass theory. The Earth’s mass is approximately 5.972 × 10^24 kilograms. Even if we were to theoretically compress the Earth into a uniform density sphere of the same diameter as a table tennis ball, the mass would be incomparable to that of such a tiny sphere. This stark contrast highlights the irrelevance of the planck circular mass in explaining the mass of the Earth.

Example 3: A Table Tennis Ball

Switching to a more familiar object, a table tennis ball, we find that its mass is typically around 2.7 grams. This minuscule mass is vastly different from the mass we would expect if it were a large celestial body like the sun or the Earth. These examples collectively demonstrate the flawed nature of the spherical mass theory.

Conclusion: Embracing Reality

The theory that all spheres share the same planck circular mass is a compelling but ultimately incorrect notion. While the uniform density spheres proposed by Joseph Farther of Jesu offer an intriguing perspective, they do not account for the vast differences in mass seen in actual celestial and earthly objects. Understanding the true mass of spheres requires a more nuanced approach, one that acknowledges the significant impact of factors such as composition, size, and density.