Renaming Chemistry Terms: A Foolish Gamble Against Progress

Unfortunately, I must give credit where it's due to the troll. This post genuinely made me laugh. You'll find that most people doing real jobs have more important things to do than waste their time on the absurd culture wars that the extreme right has invented to vilify anything they don’t like.

Introduction to the Cultural Context

Our society has been undergoing deep examinations of itself, including the rigidity and oppression of its gender roles and definitions, since the 1960s. There is a growing movement toward greater tolerance, greater diversity, and more room for everyone's unique life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. This trend is not going away. You can try to understand it by asking intelligent questions, or you can resist it and make a fool of yourself with stupid and needlessly insulting questions like this one.

The Controversy Over Cis and Trans

No bigoted imbeciles who object to the use of the word "cis" to describe people who are not trans should grow up and learn how language works and stop objecting to a word developed by academics to describe some people. The term "cis" was coined to describe individuals whose gender identity aligns with the sex assigned to them at birth, in contrast to "trans." Academics and activists have used this term for decades to promote understanding and inclusivity.

Chemical Terms and Gender Identity

No, because chemists have their own language, and the opinions of "woke moralists" about it are unimportant. The renaming of chemistry terms, such as hydrogen bonded compound, is unrelated to issues of gender identity. Chemistry is a science-based discipline where terms are defined by physical and chemical properties, not social constructs.

The Argument Against Renaming Chemistry Terms

So you want scientists to change the definition of words and scientific terms because you just can't handle it. And you think we're the snowflakes who need "safe spaces" to express ourselves. Chemistry, like any other science, is founded on well-established principles and rigorous methodologies. Renaming key terms in the field would not only be unnecessary but also counterproductive. It would disrupt the established body of knowledge and hinder scientific communication.

The Resilience of Cultural Progress

The push for change in language and terminology is a testament to the resilience and progress of our society. As linguists and scientists, it is crucial to embrace the evolving nature of language and terminology. Terms like "cis" and "trans" are vital for advancing our understanding of human diversity and inclusivity. Resisting these changes is not only a waste of time but may also contribute to reinforce outdated and oppressive ideologies.

Conclusion

Renaming chemistry terms is a futile endeavor and a misuse of energy. The focus should be on advancing scientific knowledge and promoting inclusive language in other more relevant contexts. The future is here, and resisting progress isn't just foolish; it's counterproductive. Let's embrace the changes in language and terminology as they help create a more inclusive and understanding society.