Is Putin a Social Darwinist?

Some might try to paint Putin as a modern-day Social Darwinist, likening him to the missing link in our political evolution. However, this portrayal is far from the truth and ignores several critical aspects of his leadership and the broader context of Russian politics.

The Missing Link?

Attributing Social Darwinist traits to Putin is misleading. Unlike the typically perceived traits of such individuals, Putin does not embody the characteristics that one might associate with a Social Darwinist. For instance,

There is no visible diversity among his inner circle; he lacks black friends or is openly supportive of marginalized communities. Despite making vague claims about having gay friends, Putin has not taken any significant steps to out them or support their rights. He does not engage in the social media platforms like Twitter or Reddit, either as a private individual or a political figure. Petroit’s style is decidedly conventional, with no indication of his embracing unconventional or colorful hairstyles.

American Perspective vs. Russian Context

When translating Western definitions of social justice into the Russian context, it often leads to confusion and a distorted portrayal of Putin’s true stance. While Putin speaks about supporting social justice in his speeches, the historical and contemporary context of Russia is quite different from the American perspective.

Historical Context

Russia’s unique history and the role of ethnicity, rather than race, play a significant part in its social and political landscape. Queer and minority rights do not feature prominently in the narrative of Russian social justice.

For instance, the abolition of discrimination is a goal, but the realities on the ground are often quite different. Putin has made some gestures, particularly in the realms of monetary and social support for the elderly and handicapped. However, this support can be quite limited and inconsistent.

The relationship between local and central elites remains a powerful factor, much as it has for centuries. Russian judophobia, a form of anti-Semitism, shares some similarities with European forms but has never reached the extreme levels witnessed in 1930s and 1940s Germany. However, it has still manifested in various forms of discrimination and prejudice.

Deeds vs. Words

Words are one thing, but actions speak louder than words. On the ground, Putin’s approach to governance and social justice is far removed from the ideal of a social justice warrior. His underlying mindset is more aligned with a “everything for friends” mentality,

Law for the rest.

Polticial laws in Russia are notoriously flexible and versatile in a nefariously advantageous way. This lack of stringent and enforceable laws creates a permissive environment for all sorts of misconduct and discrimination, both official and unofficial.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Putin’s approach to social justice does not align with the Western definition of the term. While he occasionally pays lip service to the idea of social justice, the reality on the ground differs significantly. Putin’s governance is more focused on loyalty and personal connections, rather than promoting genuine social and political equality. To fully understand Putin, one must consider the unique historical and cultural context of Russia.