Gravitational Waves and Quantum Gravity: Debunking Misconceptions

The development of a theory of quantum gravity has long been seen as a frontier in theoretical physics. However, the detection of gravitational waves (GWs) may not offer significant insights into this challenge. This article explores the potential of such experiments and delves into the misconceptions surrounding the nature of gravitational waves and quantum gravity.

Introduction

The detection of gravitational waves in 2015 marked a significant milestone in physics. These ripples in spacetime were predicted by Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity and have since provided direct evidence of gravitational phenomena. However, some argue that the primary significance of these detections might be more limited. This article will explore whether gravitational wave experiments can contribute to the development of a theory of quantum gravity and address the prevailing misconceptions about the nature of GWs and gravity.

The Misconception: Classical Phenomena

The nature of detectable gravitational waves is often misunderstood. As one expert posits, the only detectable waves are fundamentally classical phenomena. This means that the waves detected so far do not provide any profound information about quantum gravity, much like asking if radio waves taught us anything about quantum electrodynamics.

One potential avenue for gravitational waves to shed light on quantum gravity could be their correlation with neutrino detections. Yet, the current understanding of gravitational waves as ripples in spacetime further complicates this possibility. This understanding is based on a mathematical construct that many physicists argue is not a real physical phenomenon.

Gravitational Waves: A Misconstructed Theory

The current definition of gravitational waves as ripples in a non-existent spatium (spacetime) is erroneous. This misconception is perpetuated by the misinterpretation of Einstein's theories. The concept of spacetime itself—a non-existent construct—replaces the fundamental force of gravity and the centripetal forces that keep orbiting bodies in their trajectories. This misinterpretation is akin to the notion that the UK and Continental Europe need to drive on opposite sides to cross the Channel—a whimsical joke about a British tunnel.

Instead of pursuing this misguiding theory, a more accurate interpretation of gravitational waves is proposed. Gravitational waves are perceived as a different phenomenon that resulted from the misinterpretation of rotating bodies' gravitational potentials. These waves, as proposed by the expert, are not the same as the current conception of gravitational waves predicted by general relativity.

Quantum Gravity: A Phantom Theory

Like the graven synthesis in atomic physics, quantum gravity is often perceived as a necessary theory that can explain the quantum nature of gravitation. However, the pursuit of such a theory is more of a con job that seeks funding. No empirical evidence supports the existence of quantum gravity, and the failure to find it has led to numerous theories being falsified on the pretext of particles in the nucleus of atoms.

For instance, the nuclear theory in atomic physics, which posits the existence of nucleons in the nucleus, has been proven false. Instead, the nucleus contains dark mass, similar to the Sun and black holes. When this dark mass is stretched into long wavelengths, it can convert into energy under a dilated force environment. These conversions into particles, such as nuclei, could explain many observed phenomena without the need for particles in the nucleus.

The same applies to attempts to falsify the existence of bosons in the nucleus. The solar system, too, is not a fusion reactor as many in the scientific community claim. The Sun operates by converting dark mass into energy, not through nuclear fusion of hydrogen and helium.

The Big Con Job

The pursuit of valid scientific theories has been marred by claims of dark matter, anti-hydrogen, and the existence of atomic elements, all of which are based on theoretical constructs rather than empirical evidence. Hydrogen and helium nuclei were observed, but these observations were used to falsely claim that these elements exist in the Sun. The Parker probe findings further refute these theories, indicating that nuclei are only present in the Sun's corona and not on its surface.

The claims of mining elements on the Moon are also a cover for the real agenda: to siphon public money to fund their own research. The Sun is a remnant of the Big Bang that is converting dark mass to energy, not a fusion reactor. The use of special technology to mine solar plasma is the reality, not mining the elements as claimed.

Conclusion

Gravitational waves, as currently understood, do not offer a significant pathway to develop a theory of quantum gravity. The prevailing misconceptions about gravitational waves and quantum gravity need to be debunked for more accurate and meaningful research. The pursuit of valid scientific theories should be based on empirical evidence and not theoretical constructs that lack empirical support.

By correcting these misconceptions and pursuing a more accurate theoretical framework, we can better understand the fundamentals of gravitational phenomena and ultimately develop a true theory of quantum gravity.