Big Bang vs God: Which is More Probable?

When comparing the concept of a Supreme Being (God) against the scientific theory of the Big Bang, one must consider the multitude of perspectives and evidences presented by both sides. The Big Bang, often misunderstood as a misnomer, is a phase of our ever-evolving universe. On the other hand, religious interpretations attribute the creation of the universe to divine intervention. While both ideas attempt to explain the origin of the world, the scientific method provides clear evidence, such as background radiation, to support the Big Bang theory.

The Big Bang: A Misnomer and a Phenomenon

Originally coined as a misnomer, the Big Bang is actually a continual state of our universe that is undergoing constant change. The universe, in one of its many states, has been around for a long time. Other possibilities, such as a multiverse, also exist. However, we should not put Gods at the bottom of the list of explanations—they are mere concoctions made up by primitive people to explain the unknown. Before even considering the existence of a deity, one must provide evidence of the supernatural, which is, by nature, unobservable.

No Need for Guessing: Evidence for the Big Bang

The evidence for the Big Bang is clear and abundant. Although there are many proofs, one of the most significant pieces of evidence is the cosmic background radiation. This radiation is a remnant from the early universe and offers tangible proof of the Big Bang. There is no need to guess or speculate, as the evidence stands strong and unquestionable.

Religious zealots often attempt to equate the Big Bang with a 6-year-old bronze age king with temper tantrums who created the universe. However, there is absolutely no evidence to support this claim, not even a hint. The Big Bang theory is supported by scientific evidence, making it a more plausible explanation for the creation of the universe.

The Expansion and the Role of God

Some argue that the initial conditions for the expansion of the universe are much more critical than for a simple explosion, leading to the idea of a violent and rapid expansion. In this scenario, the Big Bang did not occur as traditionally described, but rather, it was a violent and rapid expansion. The creation of the universe went through various stages, and one of the first stages was the expansion, which was caused by a divine entity or, more scientifically, an initial state of high energy and density.

Given that every religion has its own version of a supreme creator or gods and their respective creation stories, which vary dramatically from each other, these various gods and stories are incompatible. Furthermore, since magic (which is clearly not real in the real world) does not exist, a science-based hypothesis provides a much more plausible explanation. Basic natural laws, rather than supernatural entities, offer a sufficient working model, making the need for divine intervention in the creation of the universe unnecessary.

In conclusion, while the concept of a Supreme Being and the idea of the Big Bang both seek to explain the origin of the universe, the scientific evidence and logical reasoning strongly support the Big Bang theory as the more probable and rational explanation.