An Anthropocentric vs Biocentric Examination of Human Behavior

Anthropology and biology both play crucial roles in understanding human behavior and our place in the natural world. While anthropology primarily focuses on the study of humans, biology encompasses the study of all living organisms. Interestingly, human beings can be classified as both anthropomorphic and anthropocentric, while also fitting as a subset within a biocentric view. This article delves into the nature of human behavior, challenging readers to consider whether most humans are truly anthropocentric or biocentric.

The Definition and Implications of Anthropocentrism and Biocentrism

Anthropocentrism is the belief that human interests and needs take precedence over all other forms of life, while biocentrism emphasizes the intrinsic value of all living beings.

Anthropocentrism suggests that humans view the natural world as a source of resources and benefits for themselves, irrespective of the impact on other species. This perspective is deeply rooted in the evolutionary process, where survival and reproduction are the primary goals.

Biocentrism, on the other hand, asserts the equal value of all life forms, promoting the idea that every organism has a right to exist beyond instrumental human value. Biocentrism emphasizes sustainability and the ethical treatment of all life on Earth.

Human Behavior and Biocentrism

All humans are biocentric by default, as it is an intrinsic part of our biological nature to seek the continuous supply of food, water, and other resources necessary for survival. This biocentric drive is not a choice but a biological imperative. It is the fundamental goal of every organism to sustain itself, regardless of species.

Many individuals might find it challenging to articulate the concepts of anthropocentrism or biocentrism, let alone explain which worldview holds more weight in their personal philosophies. When asked about the greater sovereignty of their own biomes or a divine power, most humans would likely reply that neither is more important. This response often stems from a lack of understanding or a general spiritual or philosophical ambiguity.

Are Most Humans Truly Anthropocentric?

From an evolutionary perspective, the principle of anthropocentrism is evident in the adaptation of species, including humans, to their environments. Evolution dictates that individuals and species that better adapt to their ecosystems have a higher chance of survival and reproduction. This natural selection process is the foundation of anthropocentrism.

While it is true that humans can often exhibit kind and compassionate behavior towards animals, this is typically a function of cultural influences, ethical beliefs, or personal choice rather than a universal default setting. In a survival-oriented environment, kindness towards other life forms can be seen as a strategic advantage, potentially increasing one's chances of survival and successful reproduction.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the behavior of most humans can be seen as a blend of both anthropocentrism and biocentrism, depending on the context and individual circumstances. While humans are biocentric by default due to our biological needs, the emphasis on anthropocentric behavior can often be justified through the evolutionary lens of fitness and resource acquisition.

It is crucial to recognize that both perspectives play important roles in our society and can coexist. Understanding and balancing these views can lead to more sustainable and ethical conduct towards all life on Earth.